The Environmental Journal of Southern Appalachia

Displaying items by tag: tennessee chamber of commerce

05142025 Elon Musk 090 2048x1365 Sixty data centers are operating or under construction in Tennessee, with 25 in the Nashville area. Karen Pulfer Focht/Tennessee Lookout

As Elon's turbines pollute Memphis, EPA head urges hands-off approach to data centers

This story was originally published by Tennessee Lookout.

NASHVILLE — U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin called New York’s recently announced statewide moratorium on data centers an “easy way to cop out” during an appearance at the Tennessee Chamber of Commerce and Industry’s Infrastructure Summit on July 14.

Data centers — which house the computer servers and storage that power the internet, cloud computing and artificial intelligence — range in size from single rooms to massive campuses that can use as much power as an entire city. Zeldin said he’s seen both bad and good data center projects throughout the country.

The EPA recently joined the U.S. Department of Justice in petitioning to stop an environmental lawsuit filed by the NAACP against xAI, which accuses Elon Musk’s company of building a power plant composed of gas-powered turbines near the Tennessee-Mississippi border without obtaining permits to power its Colossus 2 data center in south Memphis.

The good news, he said, is that “Americans mostly want to make America the (Artificial Intelligence) capital of the world.”

“The bad news is that when they think about data centers, too often they’re only hearing about those controversial projects,” he said. But Zeldin warned communities against shutting down all data center development.

“For a local community that is thinking through bringing a data center to their area, I would encourage them to ask three questions: Is the project going to make my bills go up or down? Is the project going to be a net provider onto the grid, or a net taker? And what are they going to do with water? Is it a closed-loop data center? Is it 100 percent recyclable?” Zeldin said.

The remarks were part of a speech centered on reducing the federal agency’s regulatory power to “nothing less, but nothing more” than what federal statute spells out. 

Published in News

2306channelGrading along Maryville Pike in Knoxville pumped sediment into a nearby stream and on to the Tennessee River. The owner of the property was cited for violating state water-quality laws. Courtesy Knoxville Stormwater Management

Tennessee Homebuilders Association and Tennessee Chamber of Commerce support reduced site inspections

This story was originally published by Tennessee Lookout.

Cindy Whitt and Judy Alexander, neighbors in the Westhaven subdivision in Williamson County for nearly 15 years, have watched their development grow from a small new-build subdivision of 500 homes to now more than 2,500.

In that time, on their regular walks together, they’ve also witnessed the results of dwindling green space as construction has surged:

“Almost everything from the construction runs through our storm sewer,” said Alexander. “Even though the developers put up fences (designed to prevent silt from escaping) all you need is a really steady rain — it doesn’t have to be heavy — and it all flows into our the Harpeth and the West Harpeth.”

The pair have contacted the Corps of Engineers, the city of Franklin and the state department of environment and conservation, but despite inspections, overflow ponds and new fencing, the problem persists.

“It blows my mind if we can’t even enforce the rules in wealthy Williamson County,” said Whitt, who worked for the Environmental Protection Agency in the 1970’s.

The women are now among more than 100 Tennessee residents who have voiced their opposition in public meetings and in written comments to proposed revisions to the permitting process for construction companies that Whitt fears will make the problems worse.

The proposed change by the state’s environmental regulators would roll back longstanding regulation for construction site runoff — rainwater that sweeps soil or other particles off site and into nearby waterways, often creating deposits of silt that impact water quality and aquatic life.

In an unusual move, a division within the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation  — the Division of Natural Areas — has weighed in to take issue with the permit change.
 
“We believe that sites assessments remain a key tool in understanding the character of a site and can provide documentation of ecological resources prior to commencement of construction,”  a staff member in the Division of Water Resources wrote to colleagues at TDEC.
Published in News